<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wellnessindie.com &#187; hfcs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wellnessindie.com/tag/hfcs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wellnessindie.com</link>
	<description>common-sense, holistic wellness for everyday living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Sugar Really Any Better Than HFCS?</title>
		<link>http://www.wellnessindie.com/food-nutrition/is-sugar-really-any-better-than-hfcs</link>
		<comments>http://www.wellnessindie.com/food-nutrition/is-sugar-really-any-better-than-hfcs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food & Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbohydrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corn syrup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desserts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hfcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflammation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural sweetener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellnessindie.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sugar vs. High-Fructose Corn Syrup NYTimes.com recently posted an article about sugar&#8217;s (cane and beet) overtaking of Big Food&#8217;s beloved high-fructose corn syrup in popular food items.  In the article, a market research analyst was quoted as saying &#8220;Sugar was the old devil, and high-fructose corn syrup is the new devil.”  According to the Dept. of [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sugar vs. High-Fructose Corn Syrup</strong></p>
<p>NYTimes.com recently posted an <a title="Sugar Is Back on Food Labels, This Time as a Selling Point" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/21/dining/21sugar.html?em" target="_blank">article </a>about sugar&#8217;s (cane and beet) overtaking of Big Food&#8217;s beloved high-<a href="http://www.wellnessindie.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sugar.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-335" title="sugar" src="http://www.wellnessindie.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sugar-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>fructose corn syrup in popular food items.  In the article, a market research analyst was quoted as saying &#8220;Sugar was the old devil, and high-fructose corn syrup is the new devil.”  According to the Dept. of Agriculture, consumption of the two was even in 2003, but sugar gained a slight edge in 2007.</p>
<p>Multi-national food companies like Pizza Hut and Kraft have started replacing the oft-vilified HFCS with sugar.  This should come as no surprise, but taste tests, consumer surveys, and potential profit margins always seem to trump consumer health.  Even the FDA considers both sweeteners natural, which I find disturbingly interesting given the <strong>chemical</strong> processes that HFCS goes through to bring it to market.</p>
<p>No one really knows the exact origins of sugar, but thousands of years ago, people used to chew the sugar cane stalk in order to extract the sugary liquid.  Many years later, the process that transforms this liquid into crystals was discovered in India.  And many years after that, other civilizations took this process and learned how to mass-produce it by creating the first large-scale sugar mills and refineries.</p>
<p>The process that produces high-fructose corn syrup was discovered in the early 1920s and assimilated into many processed foods and beverages in the 1970&#8242;s.  As the name suggests, this sweetner is derived from corn.  There are several chemical processes that occur to get it to its sweetened state.  Food manufacturers began substituting sugar with HFCS because it&#8217;s cheaper to produce and transport.</p>
<p><strong>Health Implications</strong></p>
<p>The real question, however, is if there is any real difference between the two, from a health perspective?  The short answer is a resounding no.  They are both high-glycemic carbs and the way your liver metabolizes them is virtually the same.  They also cause a spike in blood sugar and insulin, with the excess sugar stored as fat.  Much of it could theoretically be burned during exercise, but with today&#8217;s sedentary lifestyle so pervasive, that isn&#8217;t the case.  And more importantly,  high carb diets and excessive insulin levels have been implicated in being central to the body&#8217;s inflammatory response, which can lead to problems like obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, hypertension, and joint pain&#8230;among others.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll find sugar/hfcs in foods like sauces, snacks, dressings, candy, desserts, cereals, some &#8220;low-fat&#8221; products as well as beverages like juices and sodas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not naive enough to think that one can totally avoid sugar, so they key is moderation as I often preach to my clients, family and friends.  And, artificial sweeteners are even worse.  <a title="Artificial Sweetners" href="www.mercola.com" target="_blank">Dr. Mercola&#8217;s site </a>(search: artificial sweeteners) has a plethora of information on artificial sweeteners as well as a very good book, named &#8220;Sweet Deception,&#8221; on the subject.</p>
<p><strong>Natural Alternatives</strong></p>
<p>But, if you do have the discipline, means and access to avoid sugary foods, you may begin to wonder: what are some natural alternatives?  Sweeteners like xylitol, agave nectar, and stevia are gaining popularity because they don&#8217;t affect the blood sugar the way processed sugar does.  I&#8217;ve never really had a sweet-tooth or cravings for sugar in general (aside from an occasional carrot cake slice), but I&#8217;ve personally tried these in tea and they all have distinct tastes, so experiment to find out which ones you like.  Other alternatives like rice syrup, date sugar, and maple syrup are used by some folks as well.</p>
<p>Regardless of which sweetener you pick, the take home message is moderating your consumption of anything sweet.  Being judicious with or eliminating your intake sugary foods will help control insulin spikes and the subsequent, inflammatory health issues that can result after long-term use.</p>
<p>In the NYTimes.com article, Dr. Robert H. Lustig (a pediatric endocrinologist) says: “The argument about which is better for you, sucrose or HFCS, is garbage. Both are equally bad for your health.”  The truth is so sweet.  I&#8217;m impressed that an allopathic physician has taken this stance.  Do your health a favor, and drastically limit (or if you can, avoid) both of these sweeteners.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wellnessindie.com/food-nutrition/is-sugar-really-any-better-than-hfcs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

