W.H.O. Was Complicit In Unfounded H1N1 Hype?

Jeff — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:27:09 +0000

For the better part of January, numerous media outlets have reported that the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) is being investigated for perpetuating a global H1N1 pandemic that, by most accounts, amounted to nothing more than a mild flu for the vast majority of folks. This fear-mongering led to people seeking out the vaccine in droves. Detractors will point to the vaccine thwarting a global pandemic. I’d challenge that argument by referencing the EU countries (eg – Poland) and villages throughout the world that refused the vaccine. Why hasn’t there been an epidemic in any of those places? (As I wrote in a previous article, my family and I decided not to get the dangerous vaccines and we’ve all been fine. A couple of children at my daughter’s daycare provider had a short bout with the alleged swine flu. I can’t speak for those children, but my daughter got sick for about a day or two without any complications. And, without unnecessary vaccines or ineffective drugs).

The person who is leading this investigation in Europe is Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a German-born physician and chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) Health Committee. Specifically, he is holding a hearing this week to ascertain if Big Pharma used its considerable global influence to convince the W.H.O. to lower the alarm threshold and essentially scare countries into buying absurd amounts of the vaccine (incidentally, these same countries are trying to sell of the surplus). Apparently, this hearing is going to be held in secret for obvious reasons. With billions of dollars in profits at stake and medical ethics in short supply for the five manufacturers (GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis and CSL Ltd.) of the poison vaccine, it’s easy to see how and why this could happen. It’s a classic case of “problem, reaction, solution”.

Proving that the Big Drug Cartel and the W.H.O. colluded to propogate fear for vaccines will be a daunting task, to say the least. Drug companies’ reach is far and wide, but their close ties with large media conglomorates is one of their most insidious connections. According to a very in-depth article on Infowars (Sherry Kane), “PharmaMedia” will not let this investigation see the light of day. James Murdoch (son of Rupert - CEO, News Corp.) is the chief executive of News Corp in Europe and Asia, and was appointed non-executive director at GlaxoSmithKline. Thomas Glocer (CEO, Reuters) has been elected to Merck & Co.’s board of directors. Admittedly, these loose associations are circumstantial, so the burden of proof falls on Dr. Wodarg. However, I always say ‘follow the money trail.’ I wouldn’t be surprised if these guys made a significant amount of coin as the stocks of drug companies shot up.

Additionally, one need to look no further than local and national media coverage on this story. Because of the hype surrounding swine flu, it’s only natural to think that similar attention would be given to allegations of this magnitude. Real coverage has been relegated to Youtube and online radio. Perhaps this story isn’t as important as following the “Jersey Shore” cast or Simon Cowell moving on to greener pastures. In a fair world, everyone who was saturated with propaganda about the swine flu would be aware of the charges. These days, it seems that whoever writes the check gets to decide what fair is.

Cautious Optimism For Illicit Drug Vaccines

Jeff — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:16:47 +0000

Preliminary results from two recent studies suggest that vaccines may be an effective treatment protocol for cocaine and nicotine addicts. The cocaine study was published in the October issue of Archives of General Psychiatry and is the first to successfully show the effectiveness of a vaccine for illicit drug use. Essentially, the vaccine works by producing antibodies in an addict’s immune system. These antibodies attach themselves to cocaine molecules and prevents them from crossing the blood-brain barrier, which blocks the psychological effects of cocaine. A department within of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), named the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), along with researchers from a handful of universities were responsible for conducting the study. While the trials seem promising, the vaccine is only moderately successful and does not account for addicts taking larger amounts of the drug to circumvent the vaccine. Researchers admit that more comprehensive studies need to be done in order to determine its efficacy and safety.

In the same vein as the cocaine vaccine study, trials have begun to develop a vaccine which would prevent relapses in smokers. NABI Biopharmaceuticals located outside of Washington, DC was awarded a multimillion dollar grant to continue research on an anti-nicotine vaccine. It works just like the cocaine vaccine in that antibodies are produced that prevent nicotine from entering the brain. This in turn inhibits the high smokers get from cigarettes.

I have personally known cocaine and nicotine addicts. There are three main issues I have with these vaccines:

Vaccines must be administered on a schedule to remain effective. Keeping addicts motivated to adhere to this schedule may present long-term problems.
As with most pharmaceutical medicines, side effects have yet to be evaluated and could very well prove to be more dangerous than cocaine or nicotine. Time will tell.
And my biggest problem, by far – Our medical system continues to propagate the “cure in a pill” mentality, making Big Pharma cartels obscenely rich while ignoring the root cause of disease. This approach leads to lifetime patients/customers for Big Pharma, but never really addresses the core issues. These illicit drug vaccines do not address the confluence of issues that lead to abuse in the first place – family, depression, health, money, etc. This is admittedly much more time-consuming and more difficult to address, but the trade off is well worth it.

Source:

National Institutes of Health